Back to walks. To recap — the Phillies were great at walking as a team as recently as 2007, when they led the league in walk rate. In 2012 their walk rate was down to 15th in the league. If you look at the hitters position by position, the two biggest drops have been at first base and left field.
In 2012, Phillie hitters walked 187 times less than they had in 2007. Two positions, left field and first base, combined to walk 141 fewer times in 2012 than they had in 2007.
I posted about Ryan Howard and first base last week. Left field is the big one, though. In 2012, the Phillies walked 85 fewer times in 2012 than they had in 2007.
Here’s the walk rate for Phillies left fielders over the past eight years and the rank for that walk rate among NL teams:
| Year | BB% for LF | NL Rank |
| 2012 | 6.3 | 15 |
| 2011 | 6.8 | 13 |
| 2010 | 9.8 | 6 |
| 2009 | 8.6 | 9 |
| 2008 | 15.4 | 1 |
| 2007 | 17.4 | 2 |
| 2006 | 14.8 | 3 |
| 2005 | 13.9 | 2 |
So, again, Phillie left fielders used to be great at walking, in the top three in the league at drawing walks in the position from ’05 to ’08. They’re awful now, 15th in the league in walk rate for left fielders in 2012. In 2007, their left fielders were nearly three times as likely to draw a walk in a given plate appearance than they were in 2012 (okay, about 2.76 times as likely).
The answer to the question why Phillie left fielders walked 85 less times in 2012 than they had in 2007 has two parts. The first is that their left fielders used to be really great at drawing walks and the second is that their left fielders from ’12 were unusually bad at drawing walks.
They used to be great in this area because of Pat Burrell. Burrell left after 2008 and the walk rate for the team’s left fielders has gone pretty hard in the wrong direction since.
From 2000 to 2008, Pat Burrell got 5,388 plate appearances for the Phillies and walked in 14.6% of them. That seems important, so here it goes again — from 2000 to 2008, Pat Burrell got 5,388 plate appearances for the Phillies and walked in 14.6% of them. 5,388 plate appearances over nine years is an average of about 599 a season.
I’d show you the list of Phillies since the end of the 2008 who have gotten at least 150 plate appearances in a season and walked in at least 14.6% of them if I could. There is none. Nobody has done it. Ryan Howard seems like the primary candidate — he was over 14.6% in both ’06 and ’07, but his best mark since the end of 2008 is 11.7% in 2011. A 14.6% walk rate isn’t close to the best of Burrell’s career — he topped a 14.6% walk rate in five different years, ’05-’08 with the Phillies and 2011 when he was with the Giants. In 2007, Burrell walked in 114 of his 598 plate appearances for the year, which was a career high 19.1%.
For the record, here’s who has led the Phillies in walk rate in the years since Burrell left among players that got at least 150 plate appearances:
| Year | Player | PA | BB% |
| 2012 | Utley | 362 | 11.9 |
| 2011 | Brown | 210 | 11.9 |
| 2010 | Ruiz | 433 | 12.7 |
| 2009 | Werth | 676 | 13.5 |
Matt Stairs got pretty close to topping 14.6% in 150 plate appearances, but didn’t quite get the PA. In 2009, Stairs walked in 23 of his 129 plate appearances, which is 17.9%.
This article from the Phillies web site suggests that Hamels could start on opening day with Halladay pitching game two of the season. Manuel seems to reinforce the notion that Rollins will hit leadoff in the same article.
More on that here. I’m going to be real surprised if Rollins isn’t hitting leadoff. I think the bigger question is where Ben Revere is going to hit. My guess is that the left-handed hitting Revere hits second against righties early in the season. Less sure where he’ll hit against lefties. Lower seems like a good guess.


February 20th, 2013 on 5:22 pm
I agree about Rollins and leadoff. Maybe some day for Revere, but he hasn’t really earned that yet relative to a 12 year guy who is one of the defining members of this team. Charlie is loyal to his guys. Rollins leads off.
The drop in walks out of only two positions, especially left field, is staggering. Kind of hard to win that way, huh.
February 20th, 2013 on 7:37 pm
The bigger problem than the walks is that they got a lot worse offensively. They could have walked less and gotten better or walked less and stayed about the same. But I think the walks are a big part of what’s wrong.
Charlie is nothing if not loyal. Maybe to a fault. I guess if you’re going to have a fault, though, it’s a good one.
February 20th, 2013 on 8:42 pm
Getting worse at first, given the money invested there, is not a good thing. The irony of a Ruf/Howard platoon would be too sharp to enjoy. Michael Jack today on the news said that he has never seen Howard more receptive to counsel about hitting. Schmitty has never been one to blow smoke. One can only hope that Howard is ready to listen and learn.
The corners are bad and have been. No illusion there. One hopes that somehow Brown, Ruf, Young manage to earn their living and justify further employment.