A post earlier this week looked at the total bWAR of hitters and pitchers for the top teams in the NL over the last five years. In 2012, it appears the Phillies will have four elite pitchers on their pitching staff. What should we expect the Phillies to get from the group of Halladay, Lee, Hamels and Papelbon in 2013?
Here’s a look at the Baseball-Reference calculated WAR for each of the four over the past five seasons:
| ’12 | ’11 | ’10 | ’09 | ’08 | Avg | High | Low | |
| Halladay | 0.7 | 8.5 | 8.3 | 6.6 | 5.9 | 6.0 | 8.5 | 0.7 |
| Lee | 4.2 | 8.3 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 8.3 | 4.2 |
| Hamels | 4.2 | 6.2 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 6.2 | 1.7 |
| Papelbon | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 0.0 |
| Totals | 10.7 | 24.5 | 18.4 | 16.8 | 18.2 | 17.7 | 24.5 | 10.7 |
So, looking at those four players, over the last five seasons the combined bWAR they have contributed has ranged from 10.7 to 24.5 with an average of 17.7.
Sadly, by a wide margin, the worst year of any of the five is the most recent.
Also sadly, that group has been outrageously healthy over the last five seasons. Halladay’s 2012 season is one exception, but he still made 25 starts and threw 156 1/3 innings. Lee has thrown more than 200 innings in each of the last five years. Hamels has made at least 31 starts every year of the last five. Papelbon has thrown at least 60 innings in relief in each year.
So it’s likely they are going to spend less time on the field in the future than they have over the last five years, giving them less opportunities to accumulate bWAR.
The good news is that the average mark for the last five years, 17.7, would be a huge improvement over what they did in 2012.
The previous post suggested that the total combined bWAR for the team’s pitchers and hitters should be around 36 to give the team a solid shot to be among the four best by bWAR in the NL. If you assume a return to the five-year average for the group of Halladay, Lee, Hamels and Papelbon, that gives the Phils 17.7. Over the last two seasons, the best combined bWAR for all of the Phillie position players is 15.0. That’s 32.7. That sounds like it should be good news — it means that all pitchers on the team other than Halladay, Lee, Hamels and Papelbon, including the missing 40% of the rotation, would only need to post a cumulative bWAR of 3.3 to get the Phils to 36.
But.
In 2012, the Phillie pitchers other than that quartet combined to throw to a bWAR of 0.1. Halladay, Lee, Hamels and Papelbon were at 10.7. The other 20 pitchers who appeared for the Phillies combined for a 0.1 — that includes negative bWAR performances from 11 guys (Blanton, Schwimer, Bastardo, Contreras, Qualls, Sanches, Stutes, Diekman, Savery, Lindblom and Rosenberg).
The obvious other big issue here is Halladay, whose 2012 bWAR dropped to 0.7 coming off of back-to-back seasons in which he was amazing, posting a bWAR better than eight in both years. If you saw any sign in 2012 that Halladay was about to return to 2010-2011 form, I sure missed it. And for now, at least, the Phillies are built around the rather reasonable notion that Roy Halladay is going to be the elite pitcher he has been in recent years.
So let’s hope for the best. But if you suggest that Halladay, Lee, Hamels and Papelbon are going to combine to post a bWAR of 17.7 or better in 2013, I’m taking the under. They all have to stay healthy for one thing. And even if they do, they have close to no chance unless Halladay is way, way better than he was in 2012. Also, the entire pitching staff for the Phillies has thrown to a combined bWAR of 17.7 or better twice in the last 29 years — in each of the seasons in which they did, Hallday posted a bWAR better than eight. In one of them, 2011, Lee also posted a bWAR better than eight.
Bottom line is that the group of four has set the bar almost impossibly high for themselves in terms of whether or not they can ever return to previous, especially 2011, form. In 2011, those four pitchers combined to produce a bWAR of 24.5. Over the past ten seasons, only four NL teams other than the ’11 Phils have put up a combined bWAR for their pitchers of 24.5 or better for their entire staff (the ’12 Reds (26.4), ’09 Giants (24.6), ’08 Cubs (26.9) and ’03 Snakes (27.6)).
In this article from last night, Jim Salisbury suggests the deal for Wilton Lopez is not a sure thing.
This says that BJ Upton and the Braves have agreed to a five-year, $75 million deal. I truly do not know what Upton is going to do over the next five years. But if it’s similar to what he’s done over the last four years, I think it will be good news for the Phils that it’s the Braves and not them paying him $15 millionish a year. He does have huge upside, though. So we’ll see.
Update1: This says the Wilton Lopez deal fell apart.
Update2: This says Denard Span has been traded to the Nats for pitcher Alex Meyer.
Updates one and two are both bad news for the Phillies. Span would have filled the center field hole very nicely.


November 29th, 2012 on 2:59 pm
It’s true. The last time we saw Doc, what we saw was not encouraging. He is a proud man who works his butt off so if he can be back he will. But man he looked cooked last year.
November 29th, 2012 on 3:08 pm
It looks like the Lopez deal is officially off due to concerns on the health of his elbow. Looks like it would’ve been Valle and Cloyd, which would’ve been a steal for the Phillies.
November 29th, 2012 on 3:09 pm
I agree. At least we know he’s going to work exceptionally hard. Basically I think he’s a complete unknown for 2013, making it close to impossible to make a real prediction regarding the Phillies pitching. He has a chance to be the best pitcher in baseball or have close to no value. That’s a big swing.
On thing we do know is that he’s going to cost the Phils $20 million. So let’s hope for the best.
The Lopez deal is looking a lot less sure. That’s bad news.
http://mlb.mlblogs.com/2012/11/29/astros-phillies-deal-hits-a-roadblock/
November 29th, 2012 on 3:12 pm
Just saw a Rosenthal tweet about Cloyd. Surprises me that the Phillies think the could give him up. Looks to me like they have Kendrick, Worley and Cloyd as the three real choices to fill two spots in the rotation to start the year with Worley coming off on injury and Halladay a big question mark.
https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/274174345553780736
I agree Cloyd and Valle for Lopez is a good deal in general, though.
November 29th, 2012 on 11:18 pm
Bummer about Lopez. Probably anyone else will be a lot more expensive, huh, in both money and/or prospects.
November 29th, 2012 on 11:20 pm
Any thoughts about the Nats getting Span?
November 30th, 2012 on 7:10 am
I saw where David Wright signed an eight year deal with the Mets. Looks like he finishes his career in orange and blue.
November 30th, 2012 on 9:02 am
I think not getting Span and having him traded to the Nats is worse for the Phillies than having Upton sign with the Braves. Span has been pretty good over the last few years. The Phillies need a center fielder and there don’t seem to be a whole lot left. They’ve also just lost our on two good ones that went to teams in their own division that finished ahead of them last season.
Given that plus the Lopez deal looking deal, I think it’s been a pretty bad couple of days for the Phils. The center field thing can still be salvaged, so let’s hope for the best.
November 30th, 2012 on 9:52 am
The silver lining to the Nats trading for Span is that there is one less team on the market to bid up the price on Bourn. One less team that has been known to pay insane prices in the past.
November 30th, 2012 on 10:03 am
Yeah. But they need a guy and I’m worried they’re running out of choices. Hoping they don’t silver line themselves all the way to please welcome Alfredo Amezaga, your new starting center fielder.
I think that on the list of guys who are left, there’s a pretty big gap now between Bourn and whoever is number two among the guys we think are available and a bigger gap between that guy (Victorino? Pagan?) and whoever is below him.
November 30th, 2012 on 10:17 am
Agree.. at this point if we don’t sign Bourn, the season is already looking bleak. If we spend another year trotting Mayberry out there I may have to be a Giants fan or something.
November 30th, 2012 on 10:21 am
I think they either wind up with one of Bourn, Victorino or Pagan or something really unexpected happens, like they deal for someone nobody thought was available.
I think they know it can’t be Mayberry. Please?
November 30th, 2012 on 12:50 pm
Also, no idea, but I would be surprised if they weren’t interested in Peter Bourjos. He’s an elite defensive player and has shown some sparks offensively, although he was pretty bad with the bat in 2012. They would need to add someone else with a real bat to play the corner if he was the guy in center.
November 30th, 2012 on 1:04 pm
Trade for Bourjos, sign Hamilton?
November 30th, 2012 on 1:16 pm
Sounds great to me. Also good with trade for Bourjos, sign Delmon Young, Nick Swisher. Scott Hairston?
Okay, probably not Scott Hairston.
November 30th, 2012 on 2:08 pm
I wouldn’t mind signing Hairston just so he doesn’t beat up on Cole and Cliff any more. Or is that another Hairston. Seriously, they get me very confused. It seems like there is one on every NL team.
November 30th, 2012 on 3:21 pm
Don’t the Padres have a guy at third we could trade for? Mebbe if we get him we don’t need both thunder AND lightening in the OF, just one of the two?
November 30th, 2012 on 3:25 pm
I think Scott may be the only Hairston that kills the Phillies. Jerry a meager 197/247/277 against the Phils in 188 plate appearances over his career.
Scott, on the other hand, hit 13 home runs all of last year and six of them came against the Phillies as he hit 320/370/760 with six homers in 54 plate appearances. Lee twice, Hamels twice, Kendrick once and Blanton once.
Six seems like a lot of home runs to allow to Scott Hairston in a year.
November 30th, 2012 on 3:27 pm
The Padres have Chase Headley. Not sure if he’s who you mean, but, if it is, he’s definitely great and would help a lot. I don’t think he’s likely to wind up with the Phils, though.
November 30th, 2012 on 4:41 pm
Yes. Chase Headley. No chance, huh? Crud.
November 30th, 2012 on 10:11 pm
If it makes you feel any better, I would have said there was close to no chance the Phillies were going to trade for Cliff Lee once or sign him as a free agent another time. So who knows?
November 30th, 2012 on 10:50 pm
No. It doesn’t. LOLOL
I want new toys. Two years now and no new toys. (No, Pap doesn’t qualify. I want bats.). It is getting on in time and no smart team building is yet underway.
Can we handle one more year with the equivalent of another Ty Wigginton?
Toys. I want toys. A couple of guys to get excited about. Man, I think we all need that.
December 1st, 2012 on 9:36 pm
Soriano? Pul-ease.
December 3rd, 2012 on 10:26 am
What about him? I haven’t seen him linked on the Phils, but we could do worse for an 8th inning guy.
December 3rd, 2012 on 1:15 pm
I think he’s referring to some of the chatter around Alfonso Soriano to be the power hitting RH option. I really hope that the Phillies aren’t barking up that tree.
December 3rd, 2012 on 1:32 pm
Oh. Yes. If I had my choice of Sorianos, that’s not the one I would pick.
December 3rd, 2012 on 2:24 pm
Yup. He’s the one. The Cubbies are the guys who got stuck with him and if I remember aright, we “lost out” on him the first time.
December 3rd, 2012 on 2:24 pm
Me too.
I don’t think Alfonso Soriano is coming to the Phillies. If he did, he wouldn’t be the answer to the Phillie problems, but they need a corner outfielder who can hit and could do worse. Soriano can hit for power, isn’t quite as old as he seems he should be (still just 36) and is a good defensive left fielder. Can’t get on base, but you can’t have everything.
There is the thing about him being owed $36 million over the next two seasons. Pretty sure the Phillies shouldn’t pay him that. And the no-trade clause.
December 3rd, 2012 on 2:56 pm
…and I think last season was more of a “dead cat bounce” than anything else.