A brief break from pitcher WAR to talk about free agent center fielders Michael Bourn and BJ Upton, a pair of players some Phillies fans have their sights set on this off-season. Despite their needs in center field, I don’t think the Phils are likely to bring on either player. Just in case, though, I thought it might make sense to look at some of the differences between the two. The highlights:
- Bourn is left-handed
- Upton is right-handed
- Bourn will turn 30 in December
- Upton turned 28 in August
- They are very different offensive players — Upton is a low average slugger while Bourn hits for a higher average with less power. Despite the differences in their offensive strengths, though, there is not a huge difference in the amount of offense they have produced over the last four years.
- Bourn is an outstanding defensive player — in two of the last three seasons, he has been one of the best in the game. Upton is not.
Here’s are the lines for each of them over the last last four seasons, as well as their Baseball-Reference calculated WAR, oWAR and dWAR for each of those years:
| Age | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | WAR | oWAR | dWAR | |
| Bourn ’12 | 29 | 703 | 274/348/391 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| Bourn ’11 | 28 | 722 | 294/349/386 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 |
| Bourn ’10 | 27 | 605 | 265/341/346 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 3.5 |
| Bourn ’09 | 26 | 678 | 285/354/384 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 1.4 |
| Bourn ’09-’12 | 2708 | 280/348/378 | 19.0 | 12.0 | 7.9 | |
| Upton ’12 | 27 | 633 | 246/298/454 | 2.6 | 3.1 | -0.2 |
| Upton ’11 | 26 | 640 | 243/331/429 | 2.8 | 3.6 | -0.4 |
| Upton ’10 | 25 | 610 | 237/322/424 | 1.0 | 3.0 | -1.6 |
| Upton ’09 | 24 | 626 | 241/313/373 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Upton ’09-’12 | 2509 | 242/316/420 | 7.2 | 10.5 | -1.9 |
Here’s some numbers for the two as calculated by FanGraphs:
| Age | PA | FanGraphs WAR | wOBA | Innings in CF | UZR/150 in CF | |
| Bourn ’12 | 29 | 703 | 6.4 | .326 | 1340.1 | 22.5 |
| Bourn ’11 | 28 | 722 | 4.1 | .325 | 1359.0 | -6.2 |
| Bourn ’10 | 27 | 605 | 4.7 | .308 | 1189.1 | 20.6 |
| Bourn ’09 | 26 | 678 | 4.9 | .330 | 1326.0 | 9.9 |
| Upton ’12 | 27 | 633 | 3.3 | .323 | 1254.2 | -3.2 |
| Upton ’11 | 26 | 640 | 4.1 | .333 | 1326.1 | 1.6 |
| Upton ’10 | 25 | 610 | 4.1 | .328 | 1301.2 | 1.9 |
| Upton ’09 | 24 | 626 | 2.4 | .306 | 1228.2 | 7.5 |
If you had asked me who walks more, Bourn or Upton, I would have said Bourn. But I would have been wrong. Upton has walked more over the past four years, walking in about 9.57% of his plate appearances compared to about 9.05% for Bourn. Over their careers, the difference has been even more dramatic. Bourn was walked in about 8.8% of his plate appearances while Upton has walked in about 10.6% of his.
Both of them have a pretty solid walk rate. Across both leagues, hitters walked in about 8.0% of their plate appearances in 2012.
Most people think of Upton as a low on-base percentage guy with good reason. He’s on-based .316 over 2,509 plate appearances over his last four years. It makes it easy to forget he excelled at getting on base earlier in his career — in 2007 and 2008 combined, he on-based .384 over 1,188 plate appearances.
Over the last four years, Bourn has hit for a higher average than Upton and walked less with less power. Bourn has 32 points of on-base percentage on Upton and Upton’s isolated power is eighty points higher than Bourn’s (.178 for Upton and .098 for Bourn).
Bourn’s total oWAR for the last four seasons is 12.0 in 2,708 plate appearances. If you adjust that to give him the same 2,509 plate appearances that Upton has, Bourn comes out at 11.12, a little higher than Upton’s 10.5.
There seems to be a case to be made that Upton has more offensive upside or potential for an explosive offensive season. His career best oWAR is 4.8 in 2007. Bourn has never been above 3.5 (2009). Upton is more than a year younger and has had five seasons with an oWAR better than three. Bourn has posted an oWAR better than three in three seasons.
By wOBA, the two are nearly tied over the past two years, with Bourn up .003 in 2012 and Upton up .008 in 2011. Upton’s wOBA for 2010 was .020 better than Bourn’s and Borun’s .330 in 2009 was .024 better than Upton’s. Over the past three years, two have been near ties and Upton has a sizeable advantage in the other.
But, if you compare their WAR as calculated by Baseball-Reference (bWAR) or FanGraphs (fWAR) over the last four years, it’s not close. Bourn has a huge advantage.
| Year | bWAR | fWAR |
| 2012 | Bourn +3.4 | Bourn +3.1 |
| 2011 | Bourn +0.4 | Tie |
| 2010 | Bourn +4.3 | Bourn +0.6 |
| 2009 | Bourn +3.9 | Bourn +2.5 |
The difference is mostly about defense, not offense. While Bourn and Upton are very different offensive players, the amount of offense they are producing as measured by Baseball-Reference’s oWAR and wOBA are similar.
Bourn is an elite defensive player. Baseball-Reference and FanGraphs agree he was exceptional defensively in both 2010 and 2012. In 2012, his Baseball-Reference calculated dWAR was third-best across both leagues. In 2010 his dWAR of 3.5 was second.
Looking at the dWAR in the top table of the post, Bourn’s cumulative dWAR over the past four years is 7.9 and Upton’s is -1.9.
In 2012, Bourn’s UZR/150 was first among the 24 players who played at least 700 innings in center field. Upton’s was 18th of 24.
In 2010, Bourn’s 20.6 was second of 23 and Upton’s 1.9 was 13th.
Finally, while UZR/150 suggests that Bourn was an elite defender in 2012, Upton’s numbers suggest his defense has taken a dive over the past few years. From 2007 to 2009, Upton’s UZR/150 at center field ranged from 7.0 (2007) to 8.4 (’08). They have been below two every year since 2009, finally going negative in 2012 at -3.2. 2012 was also the third straight season in which Upton had posted a negative dWAR.


November 8th, 2012 on 12:19 pm
I hadn’t really realized how poor Upton was defensively. He obviously has the ability (or did when he was 4 years younger), but it just doesn’t look like he can do it on a regular basis.
November 8th, 2012 on 12:32 pm
I don’t think that it’s that Upton is poor defensively. It’s just that Bourn is elite defensively — at least he was in 2010 and 2012. I think Upton comes out favorably if you compare his defensive numbers in center to other potential players the Phillies might consider there.
For example, I think Upton is clearly better defensively in center than Hamilton, Hunter, Cabrera, Mayberry would be. Probably Pagan. It’s just that Bourn has provided enormous value by what he has done defensively over the last couple of seasons — so when you compare him to Upton (or just about anyone else) it looks lopsided.
November 8th, 2012 on 1:31 pm
I like Bourn, probably in part because I don’t think Rollins is a leadoff hitter anymore and we need a legitimate replacement for the top of the lineup. But I’d be happy with either.
Frankly I don’t see how the Phils expect to be taken seriously and look like they’re contending in 2013 if they don’t get one of these two guys. Angel Pagan is a nice enough guy but he doesn’t instill excitement, he doesn’t fill seats, he doesn’t convey a sense of understanding that yes, our OF is in deep doodoo and needs some serious people to fix it.
November 8th, 2012 on 1:41 pm
I think Bourn and Upton are clearly the best options. I think Victorino or Pagan might work, too. I don’t think Melky Cabrera belongs in CF — if the Phillies took a chance on him I hope it would be on a corner.
Not going to happen, but it seems like the Phillies could also bring in a huge bat (like Hamilton or Hunter) and play them at a corner where they belong. They would still need a CF, but there might be enough offense to bring in someone cheap whose value comes almost exclusively from what they do on defense.
Mayberry really can’t be in center field next year.
November 8th, 2012 on 1:56 pm
I’m guessing the Phils think there’s enough potential upside on their corner options that they probably don’t bring in a serious contender. That’s kind of why I’m looking a Bay – he costs nothing to try, and he can’t go anywhere but up.
If they don’t bring in a serious contender for CF or a corner, well then, I guess I’ll have nothing to look forward to but the 2013 Eagle season with a new coaching staff & quarterback.
November 8th, 2012 on 4:34 pm
I agree that the Phils won’t be spending big money on a corner OF. Right now they seem to have Brown, Ruf, Mayberry, Nix and Schierholtz in line to make the roster to start the year. That’s five guys, none of which should be in center. Pretty sure they can’t roster all five of those guys plus add Bay.
They can’t roster anyone else and carry all of those guys, either, cause they aren’t going to carry six OF. Still, they have to know that none of the five guys they do have should be in CF, so I think that makes it tough to add a non-CF.
November 8th, 2012 on 4:59 pm
I hope they get some righty bats, really. That’s my number two reason for not wanting Bourne. (The first is the price. Way too much/long for a guy that age.). I’m good with Jimmy hitting one next year.
Uptown looks kind of mixed. On basing numbers aren’t great for a while. But I wonder if he plays our park offensively and defensively better. I like his arm. He’s fast. Should be more pop than he’s shown. Of course, a WHOLE lotta ifs there.
Eric, I like your idea of putting a current CF guy in a corner. Like Pagan. Imagine the flexibility that provides.
November 8th, 2012 on 5:05 pm
Uptown is obviously Upton
November 8th, 2012 on 5:06 pm
I’m guessing Ruf starts the year in AAA and Nix or Schierholz (or both) get traded/demoted/dumped. I’d rather that was Mayberry but I suspect it won’t be.
November 8th, 2012 on 6:14 pm
That all seems possible. I think a lot of what happens with Mayberry and Ruf depends on the health of Howard to start the year and whether they need those guys to back up first.
November 9th, 2012 on 9:15 am
Assuming Howard is healthy, I think they almost have to start Ruf in AAA to prove he wasn’t a fluke and can at least be somewhat adequate in the outfield. If Howard is hurt, then it is obvious Ruf is playing first base (at least to me).
I think that Nix gives the team a tad more flexibility in that he has played first before (I think) whereas Schierholz has not. Plus, I think due to contract considerations, Nix will win out. In other words, he already has a contract. Schierholz can just be non-tendered and won’t be owed any money.
November 9th, 2012 on 9:36 am
I’m not sure they see Ruf as being better against lefties than Mayberry. Mayberry deserves to play some against lefties — he just shouldn’t do it in center field. I’d guess Mayberry got more time at first against lefties than Ruf if Howard was down. But I don’t know.
Mayberry and Ruf seem like a problem to me. They both should be platoon players at a corner OF position or 1B. The Phillies have a full-time 1B. If Brown plays every day, they can’t both be the right-handed part a platoon in the corner OF position that Brown isn’t playing.
The Phillies almost surely seem like they would be better off platooning either of them with Brown than playing Brown every day. I wonder if the Phillies might have platoons in both left and right to start the year?
Other than all the home runs he hit last year, Ruf is old — he turns 27 in seven months. Barring a trade or a waive, I agree there’s a good chance he’s down to start 2013. But there’s a long way to go before 2013. No idea, but if I had to guess, I would guess that Ruf starts the year up.