<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/</link>
	<description>A fan&#039;s Philadelphia Phillies blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:54:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaMannse</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78606</link>
		<dc:creator>DaMannse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 22:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I disagree completely about the relative value of regular season vs. post season. You can have all the 100 win seasons you want. Give me the parade. The Braves went how many years winning the NL East?  And in that time they won as many rings as the Padres. 

Their manager Hall of Fame?  Not to me. Their team great?  Not to me. Their staff the best?  Nope. The whole organization was gutless and over rated. Greatness wins championships. 

Fire RAJ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I disagree completely about the relative value of regular season vs. post season. You can have all the 100 win seasons you want. Give me the parade. The Braves went how many years winning the NL East?  And in that time they won as many rings as the Padres. </p>
<p>Their manager Hall of Fame?  Not to me. Their team great?  Not to me. Their staff the best?  Nope. The whole organization was gutless and over rated. Greatness wins championships. </p>
<p>Fire RAJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egrissom</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78592</link>
		<dc:creator>egrissom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that if 2013 proves to be a disaster as well that Amaro won&#039;t survive.  

I&#039;d guess that won&#039;t happen and that things get better before 2013.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that if 2013 proves to be a disaster as well that Amaro won&#8217;t survive.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d guess that won&#8217;t happen and that things get better before 2013.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egrissom</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78590</link>
		<dc:creator>egrissom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think the playoffs offer much insight into how good a team was.  I think what they did over the regular season was much more important.  If you were going to try to put a team together specifically to do well in post-season games, I think I would focus on dominating starting pitching.  The Phillies had that in 2010 and 2011 and were terrible in the post-season.

I don&#039;t think you can blame Amaro for either &#039;10 or &#039;11 post-season (or &#039;09).

He definitely inherited a great team.  I don&#039;t think we should say because that&#039;s the case Gillick should get credit for everything that happened 2009-11.  The Phillies won more games in each of the seasons after Gillick left (09-11) than they did in any of the seasons that he was here.

The Halladay deal was a good deal for the Phillies.  Trading for Cliff Lee was a good deal for the Phillies.

I agree that Amaro has had an ugly year in 2012.  It&#039;s not over yet, though.  Even if it does end as badly as most of us expect, I think he&#039;s still going to get more chances and overall it&#039;s hard to complain too much about the results of the last four seasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the playoffs offer much insight into how good a team was.  I think what they did over the regular season was much more important.  If you were going to try to put a team together specifically to do well in post-season games, I think I would focus on dominating starting pitching.  The Phillies had that in 2010 and 2011 and were terrible in the post-season.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you can blame Amaro for either &#8217;10 or &#8217;11 post-season (or &#8217;09).</p>
<p>He definitely inherited a great team.  I don&#8217;t think we should say because that&#8217;s the case Gillick should get credit for everything that happened 2009-11.  The Phillies won more games in each of the seasons after Gillick left (09-11) than they did in any of the seasons that he was here.</p>
<p>The Halladay deal was a good deal for the Phillies.  Trading for Cliff Lee was a good deal for the Phillies.</p>
<p>I agree that Amaro has had an ugly year in 2012.  It&#8217;s not over yet, though.  Even if it does end as badly as most of us expect, I think he&#8217;s still going to get more chances and overall it&#8217;s hard to complain too much about the results of the last four seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s like I said, Greg.. GM moves are for the most part felt a few years down the road, not immediately. Take the Mets, for example. You can credit Sandy Alderson all you want, but for the most part the team is an Omar Minaya team minus a couple of high profile mistakes. Credit should really be to Omar for the team not reaching Kansas City levels of futility this year.

In the same way, the 09-11 teams were Pat Gillick teams, with RAJ making a few apparently schizophrenic high profile moves along the way. Year 3 or 4 is when the long term effects of a GM start being felt (with drafts, trades involving prospects, long term contracts that players may not be living up to, etc.), and for the most part what we&#039;ve learned is that the well is dry and RAJ didn&#039;t bother to contract with a neighboring city to have water imported.

I&#039;m not saying I&#039;d be a better GM. I am saying I have a pretty good idea what better GM&#039;ing looks like and this ain&#039;t it. There&#039;s a pretty good chance that Montgomery et. al. give him a pass this year, but if they fail to do two of the following -- get a real left fielder, get a real 3rd baseman, lock up Cole -- and aren&#039;t serious contenders next year, then he&#039;s probably gone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like I said, Greg.. GM moves are for the most part felt a few years down the road, not immediately. Take the Mets, for example. You can credit Sandy Alderson all you want, but for the most part the team is an Omar Minaya team minus a couple of high profile mistakes. Credit should really be to Omar for the team not reaching Kansas City levels of futility this year.</p>
<p>In the same way, the 09-11 teams were Pat Gillick teams, with RAJ making a few apparently schizophrenic high profile moves along the way. Year 3 or 4 is when the long term effects of a GM start being felt (with drafts, trades involving prospects, long term contracts that players may not be living up to, etc.), and for the most part what we&#8217;ve learned is that the well is dry and RAJ didn&#8217;t bother to contract with a neighboring city to have water imported.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;d be a better GM. I am saying I have a pretty good idea what better GM&#8217;ing looks like and this ain&#8217;t it. There&#8217;s a pretty good chance that Montgomery et. al. give him a pass this year, but if they fail to do two of the following &#8212; get a real left fielder, get a real 3rd baseman, lock up Cole &#8212; and aren&#8217;t serious contenders next year, then he&#8217;s probably gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78587</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim...this is another argument I simply don&#039;t understand.  How can we not give credit to Amaro when the team does well but then give him all of the blame when the team does poorly?

I don&#039;t want to come off as an Amaro apologist.  I personally don&#039;t think he is one of the better GM&#039;s in the game.  He&#039;s pretty good at recognizing and targeting star players, but seems to overpay in terms of talent to acquire that player and dollars to sign that player.  A few of the moves have seemed short-sighted.  At the same time, I know he is doing a MUCH better job than I or any other &#039;Average Joe&#039; could do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim&#8230;this is another argument I simply don&#8217;t understand.  How can we not give credit to Amaro when the team does well but then give him all of the blame when the team does poorly?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to come off as an Amaro apologist.  I personally don&#8217;t think he is one of the better GM&#8217;s in the game.  He&#8217;s pretty good at recognizing and targeting star players, but seems to overpay in terms of talent to acquire that player and dollars to sign that player.  A few of the moves have seemed short-sighted.  At the same time, I know he is doing a MUCH better job than I or any other &#8216;Average Joe&#8217; could do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78586</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DeMannse...I need to disagree with your post above regarding regular season not being a measure of a team&#039;s success.  It is really just basic mathematics.  A team that is constructed properly will win more than it loses over a 162 game schedule, but the best team does not/will not/cannot win every playoff series due to the length.  If the NLDS was the best of 21 instead of the best of 5, then the better team would win more often than not.  Statistical flukiness in small samples is just that, a fluke.

Look at the flipping of a coin, which is a basic 50/50 proposition.  Flip a coin 4 times and you aren&#039;t always going to get two heads and two tails.  In fact, you&#039;re going to get 2 heads and two tails 37.5% of the time.  Now, you may say the Phillies weren&#039;t 50/50 to win the game.  They were 102/60 (or 63%), but the Cardinals were 90/72 (or 56%) which reduces the 63% number somewhat.

In other words, the playoffs are more of a crap shoot than you (or most people for that matter) realize.  All you can do is get there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeMannse&#8230;I need to disagree with your post above regarding regular season not being a measure of a team&#8217;s success.  It is really just basic mathematics.  A team that is constructed properly will win more than it loses over a 162 game schedule, but the best team does not/will not/cannot win every playoff series due to the length.  If the NLDS was the best of 21 instead of the best of 5, then the better team would win more often than not.  Statistical flukiness in small samples is just that, a fluke.</p>
<p>Look at the flipping of a coin, which is a basic 50/50 proposition.  Flip a coin 4 times and you aren&#8217;t always going to get two heads and two tails.  In fact, you&#8217;re going to get 2 heads and two tails 37.5% of the time.  Now, you may say the Phillies weren&#8217;t 50/50 to win the game.  They were 102/60 (or 63%), but the Cardinals were 90/72 (or 56%) which reduces the 63% number somewhat.</p>
<p>In other words, the playoffs are more of a crap shoot than you (or most people for that matter) realize.  All you can do is get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric, you don&#039;t think the hand of Pat Gillick played a much larger role in the &#039;09-&#039;11 teams? It&#039;s generally difficult for a new GM to impact a team (one way or another) for the first couple years.

Agree with Bill that the games where most of the bullpen doesn&#039;t play will certainly turn out a lot better than the games where they do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, you don&#8217;t think the hand of Pat Gillick played a much larger role in the &#8217;09-&#8217;11 teams? It&#8217;s generally difficult for a new GM to impact a team (one way or another) for the first couple years.</p>
<p>Agree with Bill that the games where most of the bullpen doesn&#8217;t play will certainly turn out a lot better than the games where they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaMannse</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78583</link>
		<dc:creator>DaMannse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And Doc tonight. Fingers crossed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Doc tonight. Fingers crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I kinda like this recipe.  Starter goes 8 IP, maybe even 7.1 IP sometimes and Papelbon shuts it down.  Win.  Just eliminate the mess in the middle.

Vic with three hits, base running was a bit rough though.  Howard with a dinger, almost two.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda like this recipe.  Starter goes 8 IP, maybe even 7.1 IP sometimes and Papelbon shuts it down.  Win.  Just eliminate the mess in the middle.</p>
<p>Vic with three hits, base running was a bit rough though.  Howard with a dinger, almost two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaMannse</title>
		<link>http://www.philliesflow.com/2012/07/16/second-impressions/#comment-78577</link>
		<dc:creator>DaMannse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 01:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philliesflow.com/?p=8130#comment-78577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kinda feel like regular season records are not the measure of a team&#039;s or a GM&#039;s success, really. They are nice of course  but the post season is where the excitement, money, and the measure of a season is accomplished.  It is where the action is.  And the Phillies have accomplished less every year.  To say the downward arc that began with Amaro&#039;s tenure is not his responsibility isn&#039;t convincing to me, I guess. 

And the additional wild card this year underscores that, assuming they miss the post season entirely. .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda feel like regular season records are not the measure of a team&#8217;s or a GM&#8217;s success, really. They are nice of course  but the post season is where the excitement, money, and the measure of a season is accomplished.  It is where the action is.  And the Phillies have accomplished less every year.  To say the downward arc that began with Amaro&#8217;s tenure is not his responsibility isn&#8217;t convincing to me, I guess. </p>
<p>And the additional wild card this year underscores that, assuming they miss the post season entirely. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
