Today’s point is that losing all your games hurts your chances of getting to 90 wins.
When the season started, the Phillies needed to win about 5 1/2 of every ten games (a little more) to get to 90 wins for the season. Not so much anymore. If the Phils win 20 in a row coming out of the break, they will still need to play to a .600 winning percentage in their remaining 55 games to get to 90 wins.
To win 90 of 162 games, a team needs to play to a winning percentage of about .556. There aren’t 162 games left for the Phillies in 2012. Given their current 37-50 record, if the Phillies won their first 26 games to start the second half of the season, they would need a .551 winning percentage in their remaining games to get to 90 wins. If they won their first 25 they would need a .560 winning percentage in their remaining games to get to 90.
Here’s a look at the winning percentage the Phillies needed to play to for the rest of their games if they were going to get to 90 wins after each day they’ve played this season:
|
Date |
Played |
Wins needed for 90 |
Games left |
WPCT needed |
|
4/5 |
1 |
89 |
161 |
0.553 |
So, for example, the Phillies beat the Pirates 1-0 on Opening Day. After that day they had played one game and needed 89 more wins to get to 90. To win 89 of the 161 games they had left they would have needed to play to a .553 winnings percentage the rest of the way.
After losing to the Braves 4-3 on July 8, the Phillies are 37-50 and would need to play to a .707 winning percentage in their remaining 75 games to get to 90 wins. And while the Phils might go 53-22 the rest of the way, there’s an even bigger chance that won’t even happen.
The .553 needed winning percentage after the Opening Day win was the lowest mark on the year for the Phillies. The current .707 winning percentage is the highest it has been all season. The Opening Day win was the only day of the season in which the Phillies ended the day with a winning percentage for the year (1.000) that was greater than their needed winning percentage the rest of the way (.553) if they were going to get to 90 wins. Their current winning percentage of .425 is .281 lower than the .707 they would need the rest of the way to get to 90 wins. That’s the biggest difference between the two since the Phillies were 1-3 after four games.
The high mark for the year for the Phillies was three games over .500. That came after a June 1 win over the Fish that made them 28-25 on the season. They needed a .569 winning percentage (62-47) the rest of the way to get to 90 at that point, which was still higher than their .528 winning percentage for the year. Since then they’ve gone 9-25.
Eleven games ago, coming off of a June 26 win against the Pirates, their needed winning percentage the rest of the way was .628. Since then the Phillies have gone 1-10.
Going 10-1 in their first 11 games after the break doesn’t get the Phillies back to the same point they were at after winning on June 28, cause they have 22 fewer games to play and they were behind pace before they played the 22. If they go 10-1 in the first 11 after the break, they’re at 47-51 with 64 games left. They would need to go 43-21 over those 64 to get to 90 wins, which is a .672 winning percentage.
If they win 20 games in a row coming off the break, the Phillies are 57-50 and still have to play to a .600 winning percentage in their remaining 55 (33-22) games to get to 90 wins.
Running out of time is the theme here, cause the chart above is a lot less impressed with wins than it used to be and losses hurt a lot more, too. If the Phils win their first game after the break, they would need 52 wins in 74 games to get to 90. The needed winning percentage would drop from .707 to about .703. If they lost, though, they need 53 wins in 74 games. The needed winning percentage would rise much more substantially than it fell with a win, popping all the way up to .716. So the result of game one of the second half will either drop the needed winning percentage by about .004 or raise it by about .009.
There’s really not a lot of silver lining to be found. The closest I can get is that it isn’t going to take 90 wins to get into the playoffs. My guess is 88 does it and 86 or 87 gives you a solid chance.


July 10th, 2012 on 11:39 am
Well aren’t you just a ray of sunshine this morning?!?
July 10th, 2012 on 11:46 am
I know. Sorry.
July 10th, 2012 on 1:03 pm
The number looked much easier for 85 wins
On the afore-mentioned June 1, I had quite a bit of faith that we could keep the ship afloat until the rescue team arrived. Now, not so much.
July 10th, 2012 on 1:13 pm
Agree with Jim. I felt a ton better about this team a month ago. Just seems like everything that could go wrong did over the last 30 or so games.
July 10th, 2012 on 1:19 pm
37-50 to 85-77 means the Phillies would have to go 48-27 the rest of the way. Seems possible. That’s a .640 winning percentage. If you played to a .640 winning percentage over 162 games you would go 104-58.
I’d really like to think this isn’t hopeless, but it’s a little tough.
July 10th, 2012 on 2:55 pm
One HUGE change that would give us a chance would be if the bullpen got airtight. I heard on 610 this afternoon that the pen lost or blew 17 games.
SEVENTEEN!!!!!!!
Stopping that would make a huge difference, obviously. And might be the ray of sunshine the stats don’t provide.
July 10th, 2012 on 3:50 pm
On the bullpen…I see a lot of guys out there that either a) have talent but not experience or b) have experience but no talent.
My hope is that if/when the team throws in the towel, they give more innings to the guys with talent so that they can get the experience. I’m thinking of guys like Diekman, Schwimmer, DeFratus (when healthy), Rosenberg, etc. The guys like Valdes and Sanches, and anybody else who should have a ‘z’ in their name would hopefully get less innings. Hopefully this will help them sort out who will be helpful in 2013.
July 10th, 2012 on 3:54 pm
I find it somewhat amazing that this is the first post this year filed under “It’s the end of the world …”
I expect more to come.
July 10th, 2012 on 4:50 pm
Don’t actually pull that particular label out that often. I think the last time was in 2009 when they announced the Polanco signing. Seems fitting somehow.
http://www.philliesflow.com/2009/12/03/the-placido-effect/
July 10th, 2012 on 4:05 pm
I would much rather have guys with experience. If for no other reason, Manuel is a lot more willing to put them into the game than guys without.
Not sure what the criteria is for games blown by the bullpen, but 17 seems like too many. I don’t think they Phillies would be 54-33 now instead of 37-50 if they had a good bullpen. Maybe if their bullpen allowed zero runs.
Bigger problem for the Phillies now is that whether the bullpen cost them seven or 17 games in the first half, they’re in an enormous hole. If there’s a solution it’s definitely about pitching — adding bullpen by trade, moving existing rotation guys into the pen or letting Tyler Cloyd start or pitch in relief might be part of the solution. But they need a solution that makes them win about seven out of ten games, so if it’s coming it’s going to have more than one piece.
July 10th, 2012 on 4:34 pm
I was only half listening when they said it, but I believe they said that there were 17 games either tied or with the lead when given to the bullpen that were then lost with the pen on the mound. And yeah, 17 sounds impossible. But I’m sure that’s what I heard them say.
July 10th, 2012 on 4:57 pm
I’m sure you heard it right. Just wonder what their criteria were for a game blown by the bullpen. Whatever it was, I agree that the bullpen was a huge factor and whatever the number it was higher than it should have been.
July 10th, 2012 on 10:04 pm
Kind of wondering what’s gonna happen with Hamels.