In 2010, the Phillies were outstanding at preventing walks. They walked just 416 batters, which was the fewest that any National League team had walked in a season since the Mets walked 401 batters in 1995.
The effort was led by Halladay, who walked 30 hitters in 250 2/3 innings in 2010, but the pitchers other than Halladay on the 2010 Phils were good at preventing walks as well. The non-Halladay pitchers combined to walk batters at a lower rate than the Cardinals, who were the second-best pitching staff at preventing walks overall in 2010.
The Phils weren’t particularly outstanding at preventing walks when pitching in relief, though. Only four NL teams saw their relievers walk fewer batters in 2010, but the Phils called on their bullpen to pitch fewer innings than anyone in the NL. By walks allowed per inning pitched, the relievers of seven NL teams were better at preventing walks in 2010 than the Phillie relievers were.
That has slipped even further in the early part of this season. In 2011, the Phils have allowed fewer walks overall than any team in baseball (although the Braves, who have played three more games, are allowing slightly fewer walks per nine innings). The walk rate for the starters has gotten a little bit worse (2.57 per nine in 2010 to 2.71 per nine so far this year), but the walk rate for the relievers has gotten a lot worse.
The table below shows the number of innings pitched for the Phillies bullpen in the last two seasons, the number of walks and the rate at which each of the teams issued walks per nine innings and how those numbers rank in the NL for that year:
| Year | IP | NL Rank | BB | NL Rank | BB/9 | NL Rank |
| 2011 | 74 1/3 | 16 | 36 | 6 | 4.36 | 14 |
| 2010 | 421 | 16 | 177 | 12 | 3.78 | 8 |
So in both 2010 and 2011, the Phillies are at the bottom of the NL in terms of innings pitched by their relievers, but the rate at which their relievers have issued walks per nine innings has gone from the middle of the pack in 2010 to the bottom of it in 2011.
In looking to explain the problems with the walk rate for the bullpen in the early going, you have to look at Kendrick and Herndon. That duo has combined to walk 15 in 23 2/3 innings pitched, which is way too many. If you remove the numbers for Kendrick and Herndon, the bullpen is allowing walks at a very similar rate to 2010 — 3.78 per nine innings in 2010 and 3.73 for the non-Kendrick and Herndon pitchers in 2011.
Kendrick in particular is a guy whose walks we should be watching. He was fantastic as a 22-year-old in 2007. In that year he walked just 25 in 121 innings, about 1.86 per nine innings, and threw to a 3.87 ERA with a 1.27 ratio. Since the end of 2007, he’s allowed 2.95 walks per inning and thrown to a 4.86 ERA with a 1.47 ratio. So far in 2011 he’s walked eight in 13 innings, although four of the eight walks that he’s allowed have been intentional. He leads all pitchers in either league in intentional walks and is tied for 201st in innings pitched.
Cole Hamels (3-1, 3.13) faces righty Livan Hernandez (3-2, 3.23) tonight as Jayson Werth and the Nationals come to Philadelphia. Righties have done nothing with Hernandez this season — they’re hitting 230/284/297 against him for the year without a home run. He faced the Phils on April 12 and held them to a run over 6 2/3 innings. Blanton struggled in that game and Washington won 7-3. Hamels was hit hard by the Mets in his first start of the year and was charged with six runs in 2 2/3 innings. Since then he’s made four starts in which he’s thrown to a 1.55 ERA with an 0.90 ratio and struck out 31 in 29 innings. He’s gone at least seven innings in each of his last four starts.
Someone might know when Chase Utley will return, but it’s not me. According to this article, Utley played in a “semi-simulated” game on Sunday that involved running, fielding and, and I swear I’m not making this up, sitting in the dugout. So at least we can cross that milestone off the list. If he can just break through the drinking with a straw barrier we could see him any day now. It’s probably best if you just read the article, cause I promise I have no idea. I do think someone needs to consider calling, um, balderdash on the “semi-simulated” game, though, cause I’m not convinced that’s really a thing.
Ditto the having no idea on Domonic Brown, who is now hitting 333/385/625 between Clearwater and Lehigh Valley in his first 24 at-bats back.
This says that Oswalt could start on Saturday against the Braves.

May 3rd, 2011 on 2:21 pm
Herndon certainly looked good when he was first signed, and by that I mean before his first season started when we could “project” what he would add to the team. That has not worked out very well, a puzzle really when I hear people talk about how good his “stuff” is supposed to be. I guess given your stats here his poor performance must correlate with his lack of control, ie, when he does not walk someone, he leaves his pitches in the middle of the plate. Not even Doc can get away with that.
Kendrick is more of a concern to me because I think he is supposed to be the “future” of our staff, or a good measure of it. Once again, here is a pitcher with decent stuff, but he does get his head handed to him, and often. You can hear the crowd moan when he comes into a game. I am concerned about this guy because we really need him to become what he is supposed to be able to be. And sooner would be better than later.
May 3rd, 2011 on 2:39 pm
I don’t think Kendrick will ever be relied upon by the Phillies to have a meaningful spot in the rotation. In fact, I’d be surprised if he is still on the team next year.
Herndon seems to be this year’s Baez. Hopefully they will send the guy down to AAA as others start coming off of the DL. Stutes is pitching better, albeit in a much more limited sample size.
Has Utley passed the chewing gum/walking test?
May 3rd, 2011 on 2:43 pm
Herndon kinda baffles me. I understand it’s better to have him than not, but they’ve sure invested a lot to keep him on the team. It’s not going well. Opponents have now hit .325 against him for his career. Not sure what the scouts saw, but there’s really nothing outstanding about his minor league numbers.
I’m worried we may have already seen the best of Kendrick. He’s getting passed up by guys coming up like Worley and I think there’s a big danger that is going to continue to happen. He does have a nifty 2.08 ERA so far for the year, but hasn’t been that good. On the plus side, nobody is getting hits off of him so far, opponents are hitting just .205 against him. He’s just walked too many. If opponents keep being unable to get hits off of him and he gets the walks down the numbers will be very good.
May 3rd, 2011 on 2:44 pm
It seems like if Utley was able to chew gum and walk at the same time there would have to be a press release about it or something. I could have just missed it.
May 3rd, 2011 on 4:47 pm
Yeah, the Utley health thing is almost as bad as the Flyers with Pronger. Weird to me.
May 3rd, 2011 on 4:49 pm
You know, now that I think about it, Kendrick IS getting passed by, isn’t he. Do not know why I didn’t see that before. Geez, that has to keep the kid up at nights. Does this make him trade bait, with that shiny not-bad-at-all ERA?
May 3rd, 2011 on 4:59 pm
I think his trade value is probably pretty low. On the Worley getting the start over him, a big part of the issue likely has to do with the fact that Worley is stretched out and used to starting while Kendrick isn’t. Still. Don’t think it’s a good sign for Kendrick.
May 3rd, 2011 on 6:59 pm
Well, Kendrick or not, in about ten minutes we get Cole Hamels. Given his last four games, I am looking forward to this with some anticipation.
Go get ‘em Cole. Especially the guy with the shaggy hair.
May 3rd, 2011 on 7:04 pm
Seems like Kendrick is a lot better in innings 1-9 than he is in innings 10+, at least this year.
–
On Brown, if they bring him up, who do they send away? It won’t be Ibanez.. it shouldn’t be Mayberry, with the way he’s performed, but it well may be.
May 3rd, 2011 on 7:20 pm
I nominate Martinez. Orr probably doesn’t feel safe with his roster spot, either. Right now they have 14 hitters, including three catchers, so they could continue to go with 11 pitchers give him Sardinha’s spot. Gload isn’t really an outfielder, so even if they kept the other guys they have now they would still only have five.
May 3rd, 2011 on 8:04 pm
Ibanez doubles, 4th inning. Breaks an 0 for 35. Bless his heart. May it be the first of many more.
May 3rd, 2011 on 9:11 pm
Ibanez doubles again, with ribbie. YAY
May 3rd, 2011 on 9:43 pm
Glad to see it. Double #2 was rather lame, but he’s due for some luck. The first ball he just hammered and lost an RBI when it hopped the fence. I think he’ll come back if we wait long enough — I’m just not sure how long that is.
May 4th, 2011 on 6:55 am
Worely tonight (if they play). Should be interesting. It’s still before teams have a book on him, so I’m hoping he can give us six more good ones.
I am sure Werth will remember how to play right field at The Bank, but he sure did not look all the good last night out there. Seems to me that he ought to have caught Hamel’s triple, for example.
May 4th, 2011 on 7:58 am
Happy for Ibanez as well. And I agree, the second double was ‘eh’ but given the 0-35, he needs a few of those.
Rollins with a RBI at the leadoff spot!
May 4th, 2011 on 11:32 am
He still has less RBI than Zobrist had in one day last week.