The Phils are going to the post-season and will have home field advantage throughout. Beyond that, we know that the Reds have won their division and are in while the Braves, Giants and Padres battle for the two remaining NL spots. As of this morning the Giants lead the Padres by two games in the West and the Braves are a game and a half ahead of San Diego for the Wild Card.
So who should we be rooting for to come out on top?
Here’s how many runs per game the five teams have scored this season compared to the average for the league (not including last night):
| Team | R/G | NL AVG R/G | |
| CIN | 4.90 | 4.36 | 1.124 |
| PHI | 4.71 | 4.36 | 1.080 |
| ATL | 4.57 | 4.36 | 1.048 |
| SF | 4.34 | 4.36 | 0.995 |
| SD | 4.17 | 4.36 | 0.956 |
So, for example, the Reds have scored 4.90 runs per game this season. The average for NL teams is 4.36 runs per game. 4.90 over 4.36 is 1.124, which also means that the Reds have scored about 112.4% of the runs per game that the average NL team has scored this season.
Of the five teams, the Reds, Phils and Braves have all been better than average at scoring runs. The Giants and Padres have been worse than the average NL teams at scoring runs.
The average NL team has allowed 4.38 runs per game. Here’s how the numbers at preventing runs compare for the five teams (again, does not include last night):
| Team | RA/G | NL AVG RA/G |
|
| SD | 3.63 | 4.38 | 0.829 |
| SF | 3.65 | 4.38 | 0.833 |
| ATL | 3.83 | 4.38 | 0.874 |
| PHI | 3.97 | 4.38 | 0.906 |
| CIN | 4.29 | 4.38 | 0.979 |
The chart is turned upside down for these numbers. The Padres have been the best of the five teams at preventing runs for the season, allowing about 82.9% of the runs per game that the average team in the NL has allowed.
If you combine the rates at which they have scored and prevented runs compared to the rest of the league, here’s how the results look:
| Team | Scoring Runs |
Preventing Runs |
Total |
| PHI | 0.080 | 0.094 | 0.1739 |
| ATL | 0.048 | 0.126 | 0.1737 |
| SF | -0.005 | 0.167 | 0.1621 |
| CIN | 0.124 | 0.021 | 0.1444 |
| SD | -0.044 | 0.171 | 0.1277 |
Two big things I think you can take from that. The first is how slim the margin is between the Braves and the Phils at the top of the list. The second is that the Padres are just a lot worse than the other four teams on the list. One of the teams you should be rooting for to get into the playoffs is the Padres.
Who’s the other, though? From the numbers above it sure looks like we should all be Giants fans. But surely the injury-ravaged Braves aren’t the same team now that they’ve lost Chipper and Medlen and Prado, right?
Here’s what the five teams have done in September:
| Team | Record | RS/G | RA/G |
| PHI | 20-6 | 5.19 | 3.58 |
| ATL | 12-14 | 3.35 | 3.81 |
| SF | 16-8 | 3.75 | 1.85 |
| CIN | 11-14 | 4.20 | 4.04 |
| SD | 11-15 | 3.00 | 4.19 |
| Total for Group |
70-57 | 3.898 | 3.543 |
A couple of things you should take from that. The first is that the Phillies are playing very well, especially offensively. The Reds may have been better than the Phils at scoring runs overall for the season, but since the start of September the Phillies have scored almost a run per game more than Cincinnati has scored.
The other thing that you don’t want to miss is that the Giants are doing an amazing job at preventing runs. They’ve allowed 48 runs in their past 24 games and the Rockies beat them 10-9 on Saturday. So in the other 23 games they have allowed 38 runs, or 1.65 runs per game.
Here’s how the teams stack up if you compare the number of runs each team has scored and allowed this month to the other teams in the group (not the whole league) and then combine the numbers:
| Team | Scored | Allowed | Total |
| SF | -0.04 | 0.48 | 0.44 |
| PHI | 0.33 | -0.01 | 0.32 |
| CIN | 0.08 | -0.14 | -0.06 |
| ATL | -0.14 | -0.08 | -0.22 |
| SD | -0.23 | -0.18 | -0.41 |
The Giants pitching has been more dominant than the Phillies hitting, so San Francisco comes out on top on that list. I think there are two important things to come to terms with about the way the Giants have been pitching of late. The first is that if San Francisco allows 1.85 runs per game the rest of the way they’re going to win the World Series. There won’t be much for anyone else to do but watch. The second, though, is that that isn’t going to happen. In August, for example, the Giants allowed about 4.93 runs per game.
It does leave us with the question of who we’d like to see joining the Phils, Reds and Padres in the playoffs. If the Braves were at full strength I think it’s pretty much a no-brainer that you would prefer them to be watching the post-season. The Braves aren’t at full strength, though, and they haven’t been for a long time. The combination of the injuries to Atlanta and the remarkable job San Francisco has done preventing runs of late makes it very close.
On the plus side, it doesn’t matter a whole lot who you’re hoping for — the playoff teams from the NL look likely to be the Phils, Reds, Braves and Giants.
The Nats beat the Phils 2-1 last night. Oswalt pitched well, allowing an unearned run over five innings. Nyjer Morgan walked in the bottom of the first, stole second, took third with the help of a Rollins error and scored on an Adam Dunn ground out to put Washington up 1-0. Ibanez tied the game at 1-1 with a homer off of Jason Marquis in the fourth. Dunn hit a long walkoff home run off of Contreras with nobody out in the bottom of the ninth.
Rollins returned to the starting lineup and went 1-for-3 with a solid single out of the leadoff spot. He also made a throwing error in the first. Bastardo and Baez both pitched a scoreless inning in relief, with Bastardo striking out all three men he faced in the bottom of the eighth in a tie game.


September 29th, 2010 on 12:50 pm
I keep hearing PHI – SF is the likely NLCS. You could have 7 games end 2-1, and no idea who the winner is.
September 29th, 2010 on 1:07 pm
I don’t think we should get carried away worrying about the Giants. They are on an amazing run, but the Phillies can hit (or not hit, for that matter) anyone. I feel good about Halladay/Oswalt/Hamels chances against an offensive team that wasn’t even league average.
I really feel good about the Phillies’s chances against any of the potential NL-playoff teams. The Braves are the guys I would be afraid of if they were at full strength and firing on all cylinders. They aren’t close to that.
September 29th, 2010 on 1:25 pm
The way the Phillies are playing right now, I like their chances against pretty much anybody. I really don’t see any team in the NL challenging them at this point, but we’ll see. This team has been known to throw a stinker or two together in its time.
September 29th, 2010 on 2:20 pm
I think the left side of the infield and the bullpen are enough for me to worry about. I agree they should be the favorites to win the NL. I don’t feel comfortable with Rollins or Polanco at the moment, or anyone who might be pitching in relief other than Lidge or Madson. Contreras didn’t have such a good outing last night, what with facing one batter and losing the game and whatnot. I think Bastardo can strike out as many guys as he wants, Manuel still isn’t going to be excited about using him in the playoffs.
September 29th, 2010 on 3:22 pm
Ok, these fractal “avatar” pictures are kinda weird..
Anyway, yes, the best plan for the bullpen is not to use it. Which is entirely possible. We could have 27 innings thrown by starters in the NLDS, and walk away with a sweep. (Oswalt, though, seems likely to give way to the back end of the bullpen; he doesn’t seem to be going that long.)
If Halladay loads the bases with a lefty at bat with 1 out in the 7th inning, are you really going to pull him for Bastardo? Mathieson? Romero, even? I don’t think so.
September 29th, 2010 on 4:00 pm
I don’t know how they’re going to ensure that Madson pitches in every game with that kind of thinking. It’s like you don’t even want him to spend the entire off-season in the hospital cursing Manuel with his arm in a cast.
Three aces or not, they’re going to have to use their bullpen. Two guys isn’t going to be enough. Come to think of it, I can’t really imagine a tight game where I’m going to feel real confident about Lidge. Durbin? Romero? Not making me feel all warm and fuzzy.I feel a little better about Contreras, but I don’t think 2 1/2 guys is enough, either.
September 29th, 2010 on 4:08 pm
I’d feel better about Romero if he didn’t have a bunch of appearances that consisted of Batters Faced: 1. BB: 1.
September 29th, 2010 on 4:14 pm
Jim, you’re awfully picky. What else is he going to do if he’s only in there for one guy? Get an out? Sheesh!
Also, am I stuck with the green avatar forever?
September 29th, 2010 on 4:18 pm
It’s kind of a problem when a guy built a reputation for walking way too many hitters coming into the season sets a career-high for walks per nine innings (he’s at 7.2 right now). Romero has walked 22.7% of the batters he has faced this month. If Halladay had done that for the season and faced the number of batters that he has, he would have walked 226 instead of the 30 he actually has. The Phils might even have pulled him from the rotation when the walks got up near the 190 mark or so.
I think you’re green forever, probably.
September 29th, 2010 on 6:39 pm
To me, it all depends upon which Phillies team shows up. If the team that shows up is the team that seems to hold their bats by the fat end and cannot hit anyone, I doubt it will matter much who is in the ‘pen or on the bench. If the offensive monster Phillies team shows up, we might, with Moses Malone, just say, “fo’, fo’, fo’!”
September 29th, 2010 on 7:08 pm
I think it’s gotta be three-fo-fo, but I agree that if the Phils are rolling there’s nobody that can stop them. I feel pretty good about the way the team is hitting these days. Hopefully they don’t drop three of four and score like eight runs to end the season. Even if they do I expect them to hit in the post-season.
September 29th, 2010 on 7:42 pm
As long as I do not have to listen to the Tomahawk chop. ALMOST as annoying as “Let’s Go Mets”. At least the Mets don’t have to prerecord their chant.